The Columbia Shuttle catastrophe still carries a heavy weight on the minds of many 20 years on. The thought of a nation still stunned by the tragedy that ended the lives of seven brave individuals still lingers in the minds of many.
On February 1, 2003, the Space Shuttle Columbia, STS-107 mission launch was scheduled. The mission included seven crew members including commander Rick Husband, pilot Willie McCool, payload commander Mike Anderson, mission specialists Kalpana Chawla, David Brown, Laurel Clark and payload specialist, Ilan Ramon.
Despite the confidence and hope among the crew members and the mission control team, Columbia and its seven-member crew tragically perished on February 1st 2003. An analysis of the event revealed that a piece of foam insulation, roughly the size and weight of a briefcase, broke off from the space shuttle’s external fuel tank and damaged the left wing. During re-entry, the damaged wing created drag, overheated and caused the shuttle to recover.
The tragedy shocked not only the space community but the entire nation. For many, the Columbia Shuttle disaster was a reminder of the risks of space exploration and the sacrifices of those brave individuals for a greater purpose. It also reminded us that although we are capable of reaching for the stars, risk should not be underestimated and safety procedures must continue to be vigorously pursued. To honor the crew, President Bush ordered flags to be flown at half-mast and declared a national day of mourning.
20 years on, the Columbia Shuttle disaster has changed the way space exploration is conducted. With all seven crew members remembered and exemplary inspiration, the US space program has taken great strides to ensure similar disasters are never repeated. For instance, the space shuttle launch rules and requirements have been substantially amended to include a more rigid framework for assessing potential threats. In addition, technology advancement such as computer-aided impact analysis and satellite tracking are used to detect any potential danger from foam insulation or otherwise.
Furthermore, the Columbia Shuttle tragedy resulted in the creation of the Columbia accident investigation board, a special oversight panel dedicated to overseeing the safety of the US space program. The Board published its report in 2003 which identified a range of problems with the space shuttle’s construction, management and risk assessment. These findings have since been taken on board to ensure the US space program is as safe as it could possibly be.
The Columbia Shuttle disaster took the lives of seven brave individuals and was an enormous tragedy. 20 years on, the disaster serves as an important reminder of the courage and dedication of those brave individuals, and the efforts and diligence taken to ensure the safety of those who are willing to explore our solar system.
On the morning of February 1, 2003, US President George W. Bush went dwell on television to address to the American general public. It was the 2nd time in the course of his continue to youthful presidency that Bush had experienced to split terrible news to the nation. What Bush had to say claimed would shake America and, certainly, the complete world.
“My fellow Us citizens, this day has introduced horrible information and great sadness to our region,” he stated, “the Columbia is misplaced. There are no survivors.”
A several several hours previously, just ahead of 8:50 a.m. eastern time in the US, a sensor on the shuttle had claimed a strain on the spacecraft’s still left wing. The wing was bigger than it should really have been. But that warning was not shown to the crew.
And in just minutes, Columbia’s return to Earth turned to catastrophe, leaving the crew of seven to perish.
A vehicle of exploration
Columbia was the American place company NASA’s to start with energetic space shuttle.
The shuttle or orbiter, as it was also recognised, was a white, airplane-shaped spacecraft that turned symbolic of NASA’s house application, and more commonly, place exploration in the late 1970s and 80s.
From 1981 to 2003, Columbia flew 28 moments, like that fateful, final mission.
Columbia STS-107 was a schedule mission to perform scientific experiments in place. It launched from Kennedy Area Center in Florida, United states, on January 16, 2003.
But appropriate from the start out, factors had absent improper. A piece of foam — employed to insulate the shuttle’s tremendous-chilly gas — had damaged off from a booster rocket in the course of the launch from Earth. And that little bit of foam had hit the wing of the orbiter.
Failure of damage evaluation
By the next working day of the mission, NASA had found what experienced took place. But a final decision was manufactured to proceed with the mission with no correcting the problems or evacuating the astronauts.
The crew was notified about the particles strike by way of an email from mission command, but was certain that the “same phenomenon [had been seen] on a number of other flights” and that there was “absolutely no concern” about its affecting their re-entry into Earth’s environment.
But when the Columbia shuttle commenced its descent back to Earth right after approximately two months in room, the decision to do absolutely nothing proved to be improper — and lethal.
Destiny of the astronauts
Right after the accident, a crew of investigators acknowledged as the Columbia Incident Investigation Board (CAIB) looked into what had transpired.
The CAIB concluded that when the foam broke off through launch, it “breached” or broken an outer thermal safety process. That injury had then permitted “superheated air” to soften the orbiter’s aluminum framework.
Ultimately, that experienced triggered the orbiter to break up throughout its re-entry and descent to Earth. The investigators identified particles scattered on the ground.
The astronauts onboard the Columbia shuttle almost certainly seasoned a swift depressurization because of to the break up about a minute and thirty seconds after the ultimate words of the crew were being transmitted to mission regulate. Then, they misplaced the connection.
It is unclear regardless of whether that depressurization was their result in of dying. They were being very likely also exposed to extreme physical trauma when the spaceship began spinning swiftly.
Then as the spaceship disintegrated, their now unprotected bodies would have been exposed to severe heat owing to atmospheric friction.
And, finally, there was the effects on the floor. But it could also be found, as it took place earlier mentioned people’s heads in the sky.
Spaceflight is still tough and risky
The story and investigation into the 2003 Columbia place shuttle accident illustrates how hazardous and tough spaceflight was — and is to this day.
At the time, the CAIB explained spaceflight as staying in a “developmental” period — and that was 30 many years immediately after the Apollo moon missions. Those people missions were being a enormous accomplishment for area exploration over-all, but they were being also marked by complex difficulties and tragedy.
A 2022 research papernoted that the optimum fatality fee in spaceflight was in the 1960s. The lowest was in the 1990s and that “since 2003, no astronaut fatality has been noted.”
The examine authors calculated a complete fatality level (fatalities for every spaceflight) of 5.8% up to the paper’s publication in 2022.
“With bigger worldwide cooperation and keeping of the International Area Station (ISS), the selection of manned spaceflights and times invested in area has constantly enhanced,” wrote the scientists, introducing that there had been “constantly reduced prices of incidents and mishaps.”
Spaceflight is no fewer tough now than it was 20 many years ago, or in the 1960s, but place organizations have released basic safety reforms and regulations as our awareness and encounter of place improves.
Was NASA to blame for the Columbia shuttle incident?
As the Investigation Board concluded, there have been — what they known as — “organizational causes” for the catastrophe.
That suggests that NASA, as an firm, bore some duty for what transpired. But no men and women at NASA or somewhere else were being at any time billed with any variety of culpability.
An solution still left untaken
It is possible that the life of the Columbia’s crew could have been saved.
Though the Investigation Board judged that it was not likely that the harm to the orbiter could have been repaired in place, the CAIB claimed it would have been “challenging but feasible” to start the Atlantis, another area shuttle, to save the astronauts on the Columbia shuttle.
They mentioned that by doing work all around-the-clock shifts, seven times a week, the Atlantis could have been geared up for launch by February 10 — five days right before food stuff and other assets on the Columbia would have run out.
But the plan was not set into motion.